Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40919263›Full record

ArticlePublic health ethics2025

Nationalism in New Zealand Media During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed Methods Study.

Emma M R Anderson, Elizabeth Fenton, John A Crump

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health ethics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emma M R AndersonBioethics Centre, Division of Health Sciences, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6076-899X
Elizabeth FentonBioethics Centre, Division of Health Sciences, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
John A CrumpCentre for International Health, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4529-102X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has revealed the complex interplay between national self-interest and global cooperation. Media communication can contribute to the formation of national identity and promote nationalist themes, particularly in times of crisis. Media portrayals of the nation during a pandemic are informative, since nationalism, specifically health nationalism, may undermine the popular appetite for and effectiveness of global response efforts. We sought to investigate whether nationalist sentiment was present in COVID-19 reporting in New Zealand media. Using qualitative and quantitative thematic analysis, we identified nationalist themes in the New Zealand media during the COVID-19 pandemic and observed how they changed over the course of the pandemic. We randomly selected 1300 articles from 19 New Zealand newspapers from January 2020 to June 2022. We identified four nationalist themes in New Zealand media reporting during the pandemic: domestication, unification, securitization, and separation. The emergence of nationalism in New Zealand media during the COVID-19 pandemic is an important consideration when developing public health policy. While nationalist sentiments in New Zealand media during the COVID-19 pandemic provided a foundation for domestic solidarity, we argue that balancing these approaches with cosmopolitan appeals to collective humanity would support policies and responses that address both local needs and global inequities.

Identifiers

PMID40919263
PMCPMC12410985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.