Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40919255›Full record

ReviewReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology2025

Deep dive into deep learning methods for cervical cancer detection and classification.

Pooja Patre, Dipti Verma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Linking RayStation AI auto-contouring with Eclipse TPS: a scripted workflow for clinical integration.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pooja PatreComputer Science and Engineering, Vishwavidyalaya Engineering College Ambikapur, Chhattisgarh, Ambikapur, India.
Dipti VermaUniversity Teaching Department, Chhattisgarh Swami Vivekanand Technical University, Bhilai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer continues to pose a significant global health challenge, highlighting the urgent need for accurate and efficient diagnostic techniques. Recent progress in deep learning has demonstrated considerable potential in improving the detection and classification of cervical cancer. This review presents a thorough analysis of deep learning methods utilized for cervical cancer diagnosis, with an emphasis on critical approaches, evaluation metrics, and the ongoing challenges faced in the field. We explore various deep learning architectures, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and their applications in the segmentation and classification of cervical cytology images. Key performance indicators, such as accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC), are reviewed to assess the effectiveness of these models. Despite advancements, challenges like limited annotated datasets, inconsistencies in medical imaging, and the demand for more resilient models remain. Strategies like data augmentation, transfer learning, and semi-supervised learning are examined as potential solutions. This review synthesizes current research to guide future studies and clinical implementations, ultimately advancing early detection and treatment of cervical cancer through cutting-edge deep learning technologies.

Indexed as

cervical cancerdeep learningmachine learningsegmentation

Identifiers

PMID40919255
PMCPMC12413234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.