Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40919239›Full record

ArticlePlant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.)2025

Differential Impacts of pH and Acid Type on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth in

Mythri Vallabhaneni, Zhongmin Dong, Ellie M Goud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mythri VallabhaneniDepartment of Biology Saint Mary's University Halifax Nova Scotia Canada.
Zhongmin DongDepartment of Biology Saint Mary's University Halifax Nova Scotia Canada.
Ellie M GoudDepartment of Biology Saint Mary's University Halifax Nova Scotia Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5494-5884

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elevated acidity from natural and anthropogenic sources can be a significant stressor for plants, affecting essential processes such as nutrient uptake and growth. While low pH (< 4) is generally considered stressful for plants, differential impacts of distinct acid types-organic versus inorganic, strong versus weak-on plant growth and development remain unclear. To address this knowledge gap, we evaluated the responses of two Brassicaceae species to organic (acetic) and inorganic (hydrochloric, sulfuric) acids at three pH levels (pH 2.5-5.5) to determine whether acid responses are solely pH-dependent or if acid type specificity plays a role in plant functional responses, thereby providing insights into the mechanisms of acid responses and tolerance. Plant responses varied based on acid types, even at the same pH levels. Hydrochloric acid promoted higher seed germination but hindered seedling growth and morphological development of roots, shoots, and leaves, while acetic and sulfuric acids had the opposite effects. These results highlight the influence of acid types on plant functions, specifically affecting distinct developmental stages. These findings suggest that plant responses to acid stress are not solely pH-dependent but are significantly influenced by the specific chemical properties of the acids involved, providing valuable insights for managing acid-impacted wild plant communities.

Indexed as

acetic acidacid rainhydrochloric acidplant growthplant stressseed germinationsulfuric acid

Identifiers

PMID40919239
PMCPMC12413534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.