ArticleCase reports in orthopedics2025
Recurrent Meniscal Instability Requiring Revision Repair 28 Years After the Initial Repair for a Bucket Handle Medial Meniscus Tear: A Case Report.
Article in Case reports in orthopedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent decades, arthroscopic meniscal repair has been increasingly indicated for meniscal tears in the last decades. Although literature generally reports favorable surgical outcomes, it remains unclear whether the repaired meniscus maintains its function over the long term while performing its chondroprotective function without recurrent tear after clinical healing. A 43-year-old Japanese man who underwent meniscal repair for a bucket handle tear of the medial meniscus (MM) at the age of 15 years presented with right knee pain and catching symptoms without a preceding traumatic event. Physical examination revealed joint line tenderness and a catching sensation with rotating motion in the medial aspect of the knee. Plain radiographs showed no apparent osteoarthritic changes. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed infiltration of joint fluid at the interface between the MM and the joint capsule. Based on the patient's history and the examination results, a retear of the MM was diagnosed, and revision MM repair was conducted using the inside-out technique. At the 2-year follow-up, the patient remained asymptomatic, physical examination revealed no meniscal symptoms, and radiological examination showed no signs of osteoarthritic progression. The present study details a case involving a retear of a repaired meniscus without an inciting traumatic event after a 28-year asymptomatic period is reported. The long-term results of meniscus repair surgery performed more than 20 years ago have rarely been reported in the literature. This case report indicates that the long-term preservation of articular cartilage following successful meniscal repair can be attributed to the maintenance of meniscal function. On the other hand, even after clinical healing has been achieved, there is a possibility that the risk of meniscal retear will continue over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.