Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40919197›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025

Soil microbial community responses to active and passive restoration of selectively logged Bornean tropical forest.

Samuel J B Robinson, Dafydd M O Elias, Tim Goodall, Niall P McNamara, Robert Griffiths, Noreen Majalap, Yap Sau Wai, Nicholas J Ostle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Samuel J B RobinsonUK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Lancaster, United Kingdom.
Dafydd M O EliasUK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Lancaster, United Kingdom.
Tim GoodallUK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, United Kingdom.
Niall P McNamaraUK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Lancaster, United Kingdom.
Robert GriffithsSchool of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom.
Noreen MajalapSabah Forestry Department, Forest Research Centre, Sandakan, Malaysia.
Yap Sau WaiFaculty of Tropical Forestry, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia.
Nicholas J OstleLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tropical rainforests support critical biogeochemical cycles regulated by complex plant-soil microbial interactions but are threatened by global change. Much of the uniquely biodiverse and carbon rich forest on Borneo has been lost through extensive conversion to monoculture plantation, and a significant proportion of the remaining forest has been heavily modified by selective logging. Ecological restoration of tropical forest aims to return forests to a near pristine state, but restoration initiatives are hindered by limited understanding of the underpinning plant-soil feedbacks, and impacts on soil microbial communities are unresolved. We characterized soil properties and soil bacterial and fungal communities using amplicon sequencing across adjacent old-growth and selectively logged lowland dipterocarp forest in Borneo undergoing either natural regeneration or restoration by enrichment planting. While many soil properties were similar across forest types, we found contrasting responses of different soil microbial groups to active and passive restoration. Bacterial and fungal community composition were generally distinct in old-growth forest and more similar in logged forest. Bacterial alpha diversity and rate of spatial turnover appeared to recover toward old-growth forest with active restoration, while fungal alpha diversity showed slower signs of recovery. The composition and rate of spatial turnover in mycorrhizal communities was most different between old-growth and actively restored forest, possibly resulting from mycorrhizal associations of tree species planted during restoration. Surprisingly, old-growth forest shared fewer microbial taxa with actively restored forest than with naturally regenerating forest, suggesting current restoration practices (removal of lianas and understorey vegetation) may be selecting for different microbial communities. Taken together, our findings show that certain attributes of key soil microbial groups remain distinct from old-growth forest almost two decades after logging disturbance, and some may diverge with active restoration. Changes in enrichment planting practices to promote rehabilitation of belowground communities may be required for successful biodiversity conservation and recovery of vital ecosystem functions.

Indexed as

16Sclimber cuttingdistance decayectomycorrhizal fungiforest rehabilitationITSliana cuttingliberation thinning

Identifiers

PMID40919197
PMCPMC12411923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.