ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development
Practice and Evaluation of Competence in the Application of Monaco Planning System in Undergraduate Radiotherapy Internship Teaching: A Randomized Controlled Study.
Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To explore the efficacy of a novel teaching model based on the Monaco planning system in radiation oncology education. Methods: Forty clinical undergraduate medical interns were randomized and equally divided into a control group and an experimental group. The experimental group underwent the Monaco planning system-based teaching model, while the control group received conventional clinical teaching activities. Upon completion of the internship, both groups were simultaneously assessed mini clinical evaluation exercise (Mini-CEX), direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS), and end-of-rotation theoretical and clinical skills assessment. A satisfaction survey was also conducted. The assessment scores were compared to evaluate the teaching effectiveness. Results: The experimental group demonstrated significantly better scores than the control group according to the 7 core evaluation indicators of Mini-CEX, DOPS assessment results, final departmental exam performance, and satisfaction scores, with statistically significant differences ( Conclusion: The Monaco planning system-based teaching model significantly enhances clinical competency and learner satisfaction in radiation oncology education compared to traditional methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.