Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40919146›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Analysis of reasons and risk factors for non-completion of radiotherapy courses in patients with tumors.

Meihua Chen, Kexin Li, Xuan Gao, Xia Ye, Yongjian Ju

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Meihua ChenDepartment of Medical Insurance Management, Nantong First People's Hospital (Affiliated Hospital 2 of Nantong University), Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Kexin LiDepartment of Radiotherapy, Nantong First People's Hospital (Affiliated Hospital 2 of Nantong University), Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Xuan GaoDepartment of Radiotherapy, Nantong First People's Hospital (Affiliated Hospital 2 of Nantong University), Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Xia YeDepartment of Radiotherapy, Nantong First People's Hospital (Affiliated Hospital 2 of Nantong University), Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Yongjian JuDepartment of Radiotherapy, Nantong First People's Hospital (Affiliated Hospital 2 of Nantong University), Nantong, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Non-completion of radiotherapy courses (NCRC) may happen in patients undergoing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Analyzing the reasons and risk factors for NCRC can lead to possible targeted measures to reduce the incidence rate. This six-year retrospective study will present a cohort analysis of NCRC from a single center. Methods: Data from patients treated with IMRT between January 2018 and December 2023 were collected for analysis. The collected characteristics included age, gender, residential area, body mass index (BMI), tumor clinical stage, tumor type, tumor location, therapeutic intent, number of fractions, insurance status, treatment completion status, and reasons for NCRC. The radiotherapy process rigorously followed Chinese basic guidelines of quality control for radiotherapy. NCRC was defined as the failure to complete the course after starting the radiotherapy. Patients were categorized into the completion group (CG) and the non-completion group (NCG). Comprehensive analyses included six-year overall NCRC rate and annual trends, inter-group (CG vs. NCG) characteristic disparities, the reasons and risk factors for NCRC. Results: Among total collected 2,112 IMRT patients, the overall rate of NCRC was 5.68% (n=120), with annual values ranging 4.15-6.69% (p=0.718). The patient-driven reasons for NCRC encompassed: perceiving the final several fractions as non-essential (n=8, 6.67%); perceived insufficient therapeutic efficacy (n=34, 28.33%); financial constraints (n=3, 2.5%). The clinician-driven reasons for NCRC included: severe radiation-induced toxicities (n=39, 32.5%); disease progression (n=30, 25%); death(n=6, 5%). Significant inter-group (CG vs. NCG) differences (p<0.05) were observed in age, gender, body mass index (BMI), therapeutic intent, tumor clinical stage, tumor location, and number of fractions; however significant differences were not observed in the residential area and insurance status. Multivariate analysis revealed that the age, BMI, therapeutic intent, and tumor clinical stage were independent risk factors for NCRC (p<0.05). Conclusion: Rigorous adherence to the basic guidelines of radiotherapy quality control helped maintain a stable NCRC rate (ranging 4.15%-6.69%). While 62.5% of NCRC cases were attributable to unpredictable radiation-induced toxicities, disease progression or death, the remaining 37.5% (35% due to insufficient awareness of radiotherapy and 2.5% to financial constraints) were potentially preventable. These findings underscore the need for implementing risk-stratified interventions to address modifiable barriers and reduce NCRC rates, particularly in high-risk subgroups characterized by advanced age, lower BMI, later clinical tumor stage, and palliative radiotherapy intent.

Indexed as

intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)non-completion of radiotherapy courses (NCRC)risk factorstherapeutic intenttumortumor clinical stage

Identifiers

PMID40919146
PMCPMC12408613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.