ArticleThe journal of liquid biopsy2025
The diagnostic accuracy of next-generation sequencing in advanced NSCLC.
Article in The journal of liquid biopsy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative analysis of ctDNA monitoring strategies in advanced NSCLC with MET exon 14 skipping mutations treated with ensartinib.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Real-World Technical Hurdles of ctDNA NGS Analysis: Lessons from Clinical Implementation.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Comprehensive genomic profiling is crucial for guiding treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, tumor tissue-based targeted panel next-generation sequencing (TP-NGS) faces challenges, such as inadequate tissue sampling. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from peripheral blood has emerged as an alternative. Methods: Participants with advanced NSCLC were enrolled in a Precision Oncology Program to enhance personalized treatments. TP-NGS was conducted using FoundationOne®CDx and FoundationOne®Liquid CDx. The study included an unpaired cohort and a paired cohort. We evaluated the impact of ctDNA tumor fraction (TF) on TP-NGS diagnostic accuracy, focusing on sensitivity as a key metric of efficacy. Results: We prospectively analyzed data from 561 patients, of whom 62·4 % (n = 340) were in the unpaired cohort and 39·4 % (n = 221) were in the paired cohort. Specifically, in the paired cohort, actionable mutations were found in 50·2 % (n = 111) of patients, predominantly common Conclusion: In the context of high ctDNA TF, blood-based TP-NGS can detect clinically actionable mutations and may effectively replace tissue biopsies when obtaining tumor tissue is impractical.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.