ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Case Report: Double trabecular metal cup without auxiliary screws for severe acetabular bone defects.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acetabular reconstruction is often challenging in revision hip arthroplasty, especially in the face of moderate to severe acetabular bone deficiency. In some severe bone defects, double-metal tantalum cups can improve the contact area between bone and implants, increase the surface area for bone ingrowth, and better restore the anatomical position of the acetabulum. Furthermore, with a good press-fit, the auxiliary screw has a minimal effect on acetabular cup stability. Case presentation: We report a case of a 63-year-old male patient who was diagnosed with loosening prosthesis after total hip arthroplasty and whose preoperative radiograph suggested a large bone defect in the acetabulum. Due to the large amount of purulent fluid found in the joint cavity during the first revision surgery, a decision was made to stage-1spacer placement followed by a second-stage revision. In the second-stage revision, we utilized a double-cup technique to fill the large acetabular bone defect. Conclusions: In the revision total hip arthroplasty, if the acetabular bone defect is severe, a double-metal tantalum cup structure can be used to reconstruct the acetabular structure, restore the center of rotation of the hip joint. Under good press-fit conditions, the metal tantalum cup can obtain initial stability of sufficient strength even without screw fixation, and achieve secondary stability through bone growth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.