ArticleBiological psychiatry global open science2025
A Case Series of Young People Receiving Adjunctive Immunotherapy for Neuroimmune-Mediated Major Mood or Psychotic Syndromes.
Article in Biological psychiatry global open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neurocognitive sequelae following seronegative anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis with ovarian teratoma in a pediatric patient: A six-year follow-up case report.Brain, behavior, & immunity - health · 2026Article
- Enhancing anandamide signalling through fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibition: An update on the pharmacological strategy for treating psychiatric disorders.Translational psychiatry · 2026Review
- Abrupt Termination of Severe Treatment Refractory Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in a Patient Treated With Rituximab-A Case Report.Case reports in psychiatry · 2026Article
- The Clinical Relevance of Immunopsychiatric Treatment: Lessons From a Transdiagnostic Case Series on Young People.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neuroimmune processes are often implicated in young people with atypical neuropsychiatric disorders, yet treatment implications remain controversial. This case series details young people with primary psychiatric disorders who received adjunctive immunotherapy after thorough investigation and extensive conventional treatments. Methods: We evaluated 45 individuals (93% female, ages 12-30 years) with atypical psychiatric presentations suggesting potential neuroimmune involvement. Participants underwent clinical phenotyping, laboratory investigation, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis, neuroimaging, and/or electroencephalography. We tracked outcomes after personalized immunotherapy through global clinical improvement (Clinical Global Impressions-Global Improvement) and changes in social-occupational functioning (Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale [SOFAS]), education/employment status (not in education, employment, or training [NEET]), psychiatric hospitalization, and medication use. Treatment response was assessed post-intervention, at 6 to 12 months, and at a long-term follow-up (78.2 ± 31.3 months). Results: Participants presented with severe depression (80%), psychotic features (56%), treatment resistance (82%), and/or neurological symptoms (96%). Illness duration before immunotherapy was often prolonged (mean = 4.8 ± 4.7 years, median = 3 years). Autoantibodies were detected in serum or CSF in 64% of participants, while 91% showed elevated inflammatory markers. Of 43 individuals receiving immunotherapy, 88% experienced clinical improvement posttreatment, with 79% maintaining long-term benefits. Functional outcomes improved significantly: SOFAS scores increased from 43.2 ± 11.8 to 69.2 ± 9.8, while NEET rates declined from 81% to 14%. Psychiatric hospitalization dropped from 93% to 7%, and psychotropic medication use decreased from 84% to 9%. Earlier treatment predicted better outcomes ( Conclusions: These findings suggest the importance of early identification and specialist assessment of atypical psychiatric presentations in young people. New guidelines need to support appropriate screening, personalized management, and long-term treatment and monitoring protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.