ArticleNeuro-ophthalmology (Aeolus Press)2025
Prevalence Screening for Familial Optic Disc Drusen: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Neuro-ophthalmology (Aeolus Press), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optic disc drusen: Recent developments on a slow-moving condition.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optic disc drusen (ODD) may present in multiple individuals and generations within a family, indicating hereditary predisposition. Individuals are often unaware of their ODD, and consequently, the prevalence of ODD within families remains largely unknown. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence and consider the inheritance pattern of familial ODD and to investigate ODD-related symptoms and their association to ODD location and size. In this cross-sectional study, 22 ODD patients, aged 10 years or older, were included. Of these, 13 ODD probands had 24 family members participating. The presence, size, and anatomical location of ODDs and the presence of hyperreflective lines were ascertained using enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography (EDI-OCT) scan. Visual symptoms were ascertained, and these were correlated with ODD burden in terms of ODD location and size. Familial ODD was found in eight of the 13 screened families. Hyperreflective lines were present in all individuals with ODD, including both probands and their family members, and in seven out of the 14 family members without ODD. Visual symptoms were reported in 14-50% and associated significantly with superficial ODD location. We found familial ODD in eight of the 13 screened families. Our results aligned with the previously suggested autosomal dominant inheritance pattern with incomplete penetrance, assuming that hyperreflective lines represent a less expressed form of ODD. This emphasizes that ODD runs in families and supports the hypothesis that genetic factors may contribute to the etiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.