ArticleHuman reproduction open2025
Evaluating endometrial response to human chorionic gonadotropin: alterations in epigenetic regulation and extracellular vesicle cargo of endometrial stromal cells.
Article in Human reproduction open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mediating Cross-Talk: How Uterus-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Influence Early Embryo Development and Implantation.Expert reviews in molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Molecular Crosstalk Between Intrauterine hCG and Endometrial Receptivity: Signalling Pathways, Immune Modulation, and Translational Perspectives in IVF.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
study questionWhat is the effect of hCG on the epigenetic profile and the expression of other molecular factors in endometrial stromal cells (ESCs)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Our findings suggest that hCG treatment alters the molecular environment of decidualized ESCs, potentially influencing implantation and immune regulation through epigenetic modifications and changes in the levels of secreted proteins and micro-ribonucleic acids (miRNAs). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Embryo implantation depends not only on the quality of the embryo but also on the receptivity of the endometrium, the specialized lining of the uterus that undergoes dynamic changes to support pregnancy. Effective communication between the maternal and fetal compartments, facilitated by molecular signals and cellular interactions, is essential for successful implantation. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: Cross-sectional study of patient-derived ESCs comparing untreated cells with cells treated with hCG and/or decidualization induction. The number of samples depends on the method and varies from 2 to 8. Results were analyzed after 6-, 24-, 48-, and 72-h time-points. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING
methodsESCs were isolated from patients undergoing assisted reproductive technologies. In the study, we analyzed changes in the epigenetic profile and other molecular factors of ESCs during decidualization and in MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Our study found that hCG treatment increased prolactin gene ( LARGE SCALE DATA: N/A. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study utilizes a comprehensive analysis to explore potential epigenetic and molecular targets essential for endometrial function. The research is based on WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsWe found that hCG enhances the decidualization process in a dose-dependent manner and affects implantation and immune regulation through epigenetic changes, as well as variations in the levels of secreted proteins and miRNAs. Our study suggests that the application of hCG in assisted reproduction technologies may offer potential benefits for patients. However, carefully considering the appropriate dosage is important to ensure optimal outcomes. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.