ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Implementation of LABSTER virtual lab in immunology for innovative teaching and improved learning in veterinary degree.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Virtual laboratories provide a risk-free environment for students to conduct experiments, particularly those involving hazardous materials or complex procedures. Previous studies have shown that gamified elements and interactive tools enhance the interest of students and promote active participation. In the case of Immunology in the veterinary degree, our prior observations indicate that veterinary students experience learning difficulties with topics related to molecules and effector functions of the immune system. This study aimed to investigate the utility of virtual laboratory simulations for teaching Immunology. For that purpose, cohorts of second-year veterinary students and third-year biochemistry students at the University of Extremadura were surveyed before and after the implementation of the LABSTER virtual lab in the Immunology course. The survey questions addressed their perceptions of virtual environments, prior computer knowledge, experiences with virtual platforms for learning, ethics, comparisons to traditional lab practices, and the perceived utility of virtual labs for their future careers. Gender differences were considered to determine potential variations in perceptions of virtual learning. Results indicated that veterinary students had no prior experience with LABSTER or similar virtual tools in other courses. Initially, nearly half of the students felt "unprepared" to use such tools. Notably, all students rated the experience using LABSTER virtual lab with an average of 7.5 ± 1.4 and 8.1 ± 1.8, in men and women, respectively. Indeed, most students perceived that LABSTER was useful for learning Immunology. Most students were hesitant about fully replacing traditional labs with virtual tools but found LABSTER beneficial for their future career skills. In conclusion, while virtual simulations are not a complete substitute for hands-on laboratory experiences, they may effectively help students develop practical skills and familiarize themselves with laboratory procedures and equipment. These findings highlight the potential of virtual labs as a complementary tool in veterinary education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.