Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40919027›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Efficacy of an intranasally administered live attenuated PRRSV-2 vaccine against challenge with a highly virulent PRRSV-1 strain.

E Mateu, M Cortey, M S Serena, I Domingo-Carreño, M Alberch, L Aguirre, I Diaz, M Martín, J M Sanchez-Carvajal, I M Rodriguez-Gomez and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

E MateuDept. Sanitat i d'Anatomia Animals, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
M CorteyDept. Sanitat i d'Anatomia Animals, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
M S SerenaDept. Sanitat i d'Anatomia Animals, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
I Domingo-CarreñoDept. Sanitat i d'Anatomia Animals, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
M AlberchDept. Sanitat i d'Anatomia Animals, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
L AguirreDept. Sanitat i d'Anatomia Animals, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
I DiazDept. Sanitat i d'Anatomia Animals, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
M MartínDept. Sanitat i d'Anatomia Animals, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
J M Sanchez-CarvajalDept. Anatomía y Anatomía Patológica Comparadas, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
I M Rodriguez-GomezDept. Anatomía y Anatomía Patológica Comparadas, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
J H Lara-PuenteLaboratorio Avi-Mex, S. A. de C. V., Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico.
C Artigas-CabreIndependent Researcher, Barcelona, Spain.
D Sarfati-MizrahiLaboratorio Avi-Mex, S. A. de C. V., Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico.
B Lozano-DubernardLaboratorio Avi-Mex, S. A. de C. V., Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The emergence of highly virulent strains of the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus has driven the need for new vaccines. This study evaluates the efficacy of an intranasal (IN) vaccine composed of a naturally attenuated PRRSV-2 isolate, compared to a commercially available intramuscularly administered (IM) PRRSV-1 vaccine, against a heterologous challenge with a highly virulent PRRSV-1 strain (R1). Methods: Sixty-eight PRRSV-naïve pigs were divided into four groups: two non-vaccinated controls (NV/NCh, NV/Ch), one IM-vaccinated with a PRRSV-1 MLV (Por), and one intranasally (IN)-vaccinated with the PRRSV-2 vaccine (IL). Results: Clinical, pathological, and immunological outcomes were assessed post-challenge. Both vaccines significantly ( Discussion: The IN vaccine demonstrated non-inferiority to IM vaccination in alleviating clinical signs and helped reduce weight losses, however, at later times control of viral replication was lower, underscoring limitations in heterologous protection. The dissociation between systemic immune markers and tissue-specific outcomes highlights the need for strategies targeting tissue-resident immunity. These findings advocate further exploration of mucosal vaccination as a complementary strategy for PRRSV control, particularly under heterologous challenge conditions, while emphasizing the persistent challenges posed by viral diversity and incomplete cross-protection.

Indexed as

clinical signsimmunityintranasal vaccinelung pathologyporcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virusvirulence

Identifiers

PMID40919027
PMCPMC12412332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.