ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025
A comparative study of EEG functional and effective connectivity patterns in children with learning difficulties during reading and math tasks.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Functional connectivity patterns in preschool children associated with working memory performance and digital device use.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study utilized electroencephalography (EEG) to compare brain functional and effective connectivity patterns in children with reading difficulties (RD) and math difficulties (MD) during specific tasks. The aim was to identify neurophysiological distinctions between these two learning disorders, which often exhibit high comorbidity. Methods: Data from a publicly available dataset of 28 children (11 RD, 17 MD) aged 7-13 years were analyzed. Functional connectivity was quantified using the weighted Phase Lag Index (wPLI), and effective connectivity was assessed with the Directed Transfer Function (DTF). Results: Functional connectivity analysis revealed significant group differences. The RD group showed significantly higher beta band synchronization in the right temporal lobe compared to the MD group. Conversely, the MD group exhibited significantly greater connectivity in the frontal lobe's delta band and the parietal lobe's theta band. However, no statistically significant differences were observed between the groups regarding effective connectivity. Discussion: These findings highlight specific task-related brain functional connectivity differences between reading and math learning difficulties, suggesting potential compensatory mechanisms in RD and cognitive control challenges in MD. The lack of significant effective connectivity findings may be attributed to the small sample size, which is a key limitation of the study. This research emphasizes the need for larger samples, refined task designs, and multimodal neuroimaging in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.