ReviewFrontiers in plant science2025
Research progress on the uptake and transport of antimony and arsenic in the soil-crop system.
Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Different Forms of Antimony (Sb) on Genes Encoding Functions Associated with Root Morphology, Physiology and Root Cell Wall in Rice (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Heavy metal accumulation risk and source analysis in soils of antimony mining areas.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimony (Sb) and arsenic (As) are homologous elements that pose significant threats to the ecological security of soil-crop systems and the health of agricultural products due to their co-contamination. Although they share similarities in plant uptake and translocation, significant knowledge gaps remain regarding the uptake mechanisms of Sb, especially Sb(V), and its interactions with As. This review systematically summarizes the sources, chemical speciation, and bioavailability-regulating factors (e.g., pH, redox conditions, microbial communities) of Sb and As in soil-crop systems, focusing on their uptake pathways, translocation characteristics, and synergistic or antagonistic effects under co-contamination. Comparative analyses suggest that As(V) is taken up through phosphate transporters, whereas the transport mechanism of Sb(V) remains unclear. Under co-contamination, As may enhance Sb accumulation by altering membrane permeability; however, differences in their translocation efficiency and speciation transformation lead to antagonistic effects. Additionally, soil physicochemical properties and plant species significantly influence Sb-As toxicity responses. The detoxification mechanisms of hyperaccumulators (e.g.,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.