Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40918955›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2025

Bridging micro and macroevolution: insights from chromosomal dynamics in plants.

Carmen Benítez-Benítez, Ashwini V Mohan, Rogelio Sánchez-Villegas, Inés Gómez-Ramos, Ana Valdés-Florido, Kay Lucek, Marek Slovák, Filip Kolář, Ilia J Leitch, Modesto Luceño and 9 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Structural Variation and Its Roles in Plant Genomes.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Carmen Benítez-BenítezBotany Area, Department of Plant Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Biology, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.
Ashwini V MohanBiodiversity Genomics Laboratory, Institute of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Rogelio Sánchez-VillegasBotany Area, Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemical Engineering, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain.
Inés Gómez-RamosBotany Area, Department of Plant Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Biology, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.
Ana Valdés-FloridoBotany Area, Department of Plant Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Biology, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.
Kay LucekBiodiversity Genomics Laboratory, Institute of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Marek SlovákDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Filip KolářDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Ilia J LeitchRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, United Kingdom.
Modesto LuceñoBotany Area, Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemical Engineering, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain.
Isabel LarridonRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, United Kingdom.
Angelino CartaDepartment of Biology, Botany Unit, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Joan Cuscó-BorràsBotany Area, Department of Plant Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Biology, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.
Enrique MaguillaBotany Area, Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemical Engineering, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain.
Alegría Montero-RamírezBotany Area, Department of Plant Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Biology, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.
Patrick G MeirmansInstitute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Alison Dawn ScottDepartment of Chromosome Biology, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.
Santiago Martín-BravoBotany Area, Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemical Engineering, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain.
Marcial EscuderoBotany Area, Department of Plant Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Biology, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the relationship between macro- and microevolutionary processes and their delimitation remains a challenge. This review focuses on the role of chromosomal rearrangements in plant population differentiation and lineage diversification resulting in speciation, helping bridge the gap between macro- and microevolution through chromosomal evolution. We focus on angiosperms, a group that comprises the majority of extant plant species diversity and exhibits the largest chromosomal and genomic variations. Here, we address the following questions: Are macroevolutionary patterns of chromosome evolution the result of accumulated microevolutionary changes, or do chromosomal dynamics drive larger shifts along the speciation continuum? At the macroevolutionary level, we investigated the association between karyotype diversity and diversification rates using evidence from comparative genomics, chromosomal evolution modelling across phylogenies, and the association with several traits across different angiosperm lineages. At the microevolutionary level, we explore if different karyotypes are linked to morphological changes and population genetic differentiation in the same lineages. Polyploidy (autopolyploidy and allopolyploidy) and dysploidy are known drivers of speciation, with karyotypic differences often leading to reproductive barriers. We found that dysploidy, involving gains and losses of single chromosomes with no significant change in overall content of the genome, appears to be relatively more frequent and persistent across macroevolutionary histories than polyploidy. Additionally, chromosomal rearrangements that do not entail change in chromosome number, such as insertions, deletions, inversions, and duplications of chromosome fragments, as well as translocations between chromosomes, are increasingly recognized for their role in local adaptation and speciation. We argue that there is more evidence linking chromosomal rearrangements with genetic and morphological trait differentiation at microevolutionary scales than at macroevolutionary ones. Our findings highlight the importance of selection across evolutionary scales, where certain chromosomal dynamics become fixed over macroevolutionary time. Consequently, at microevolutionary scales, chromosome rearrangements are frequent and diverse, serving as key drivers of plant diversification and adaptation by providing a pool of variation from which beneficial chromosomal changes can be selected and fixed by evolutionary forces.

Indexed as

angiospermschromosomedysploidyevolutionpolyploidyspeciation

Identifiers

PMID40918955
PMCPMC12412334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.