ArticleJAMIA open2025
Generative artificial intelligence for automated data extraction from unstructured medical text.
Article in JAMIA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- How Often Do Large Language Models Agree with Each Other-And with the Truth? A Consensus- and Complexity-Stratified Analysis of Data Extraction for Neuroimaging AI.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Iterative Development of an AI-Assisted Data Extraction Tool for Literature Synthesis in Oncology.Cureus · 2026Article
- Benchmarking 54 large language model configurations for CAD-RADS scoring: open-weight models approach human-level agreement.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- Clinical research on pulmonary hypertension from a 2025 perspective: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Evaluating Large Language Models for Automated Evidence Synthesis in Neuroimaging AI: A Multi-Model Benchmark.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Converting unstructured cardiac catheterization and echocardiography reports into structured data using transformer-based language models.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- Transforming free-text coronary angiography reports into structured, analyzable data using large language models.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- AI-Driven Medical Device Risk Management: A New Paradigm Integrating Large Language Models and Prompt Engineering for Standard-Risk Knowledge Graph Construction and Application.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Unstructured data, such as procedure notes, contain valuable medical information that is frequently underutilized due to the labor-intensive nature of data extraction. This study aims to develop a generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) pipeline using an open-source Large Language Model (LLM) with built-in guardrails and a retry mechanism to extract data from unstructured right heart catheterization (RHC) notes while minimizing errors, including hallucinations. Materials and Methods: A total of 220 RHC notes were randomly selected for pipeline development and 200 for validation from the Pulmonary Vascular Disease Registry. The pipeline comprised three main components: the Engineered Preload Framework (EPF), which integrated schemas and instructions; the LLM module, enhanced by reasoning capabilities; and the validation and retry mechanism, which ensured data accuracy through iterative self-correction. A clinical expert manually extracted data from the validation cohort to establish the ground truth. Pipeline performance was evaluated using precision, recall, and F1 score. Additionally, the dataset was stratified into quartiles to assess the pipeline's ability to handle varying levels of data availability. Results: The pipeline achieved 99.0% precision, 85.0% recall, and a 91.5% F1 score, with an overall accuracy of 90% when evaluated at the note level. The most common error was missed values (5.2%), while hallucinations were the least frequent (<0.01%). Discussion and Conclusion: This study demonstrates the feasibility of a robust GenAI pipeline for automating structured data extraction from unstructured RHC procedure notes. The approach highlights the potential of LLMs in medical data mining, improving research efficiency and clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.