Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40918939›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2025

Generative artificial intelligence for automated data extraction from unstructured medical text.

Nam Dao, Luisa Quesada, Syed Moin Hassan, Monica Iturrioz Campo, Shelsey Johnson, Suchandra Ghose, Raúl San José Estépar, Aaron Waxman, George Washko, Farbod N Rahaghi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nam DaoDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Luisa QuesadaDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Syed Moin HassanDivision of Sleep Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1544-3280
Monica Iturrioz CampoDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Shelsey JohnsonDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Suchandra GhoseDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Raúl San José EstéparDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Aaron WaxmanDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
George WashkoDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Farbod N RahaghiDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Unstructured data, such as procedure notes, contain valuable medical information that is frequently underutilized due to the labor-intensive nature of data extraction. This study aims to develop a generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) pipeline using an open-source Large Language Model (LLM) with built-in guardrails and a retry mechanism to extract data from unstructured right heart catheterization (RHC) notes while minimizing errors, including hallucinations. Materials and Methods: A total of 220 RHC notes were randomly selected for pipeline development and 200 for validation from the Pulmonary Vascular Disease Registry. The pipeline comprised three main components: the Engineered Preload Framework (EPF), which integrated schemas and instructions; the LLM module, enhanced by reasoning capabilities; and the validation and retry mechanism, which ensured data accuracy through iterative self-correction. A clinical expert manually extracted data from the validation cohort to establish the ground truth. Pipeline performance was evaluated using precision, recall, and F1 score. Additionally, the dataset was stratified into quartiles to assess the pipeline's ability to handle varying levels of data availability. Results: The pipeline achieved 99.0% precision, 85.0% recall, and a 91.5% F1 score, with an overall accuracy of 90% when evaluated at the note level. The most common error was missed values (5.2%), while hallucinations were the least frequent (<0.01%). Discussion and Conclusion: This study demonstrates the feasibility of a robust GenAI pipeline for automating structured data extraction from unstructured RHC procedure notes. The approach highlights the potential of LLMs in medical data mining, improving research efficiency and clinical applications.

Indexed as

cardiac catheterizationdata mininggenerative artificial intelligencelarge language modelspulmonary hypertension

Identifiers

PMID40918939
PMCPMC12410982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.