ArticleCureus2025
Evaluation of Prothrombotic Biomarkers in Stable and Exacerbation Phases of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Case-Control Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is increasingly recognized not only as a pulmonary condition but as a systemic disorder with significant cardiovascular implications. Acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) further elevate this risk, potentially through a heightened prothrombotic state. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the levels of select prothrombotic biomarkers - fibrinogen, C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, von Willebrand Factor (vWF), homocysteine, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) - in patients with stable COPD and AECOPD, and to assess their diagnostic and prognostic significance. Materials and methods This case-control study was conducted over a year at King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India and compared prothrombotic biomarkers in patients with AECOPD and stable COPD. Eligible participants were aged between 30 and 80 years old and diagnosed with COPD, as per the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria. CRP, fibrinogen, D-dimer, and vWF were analyzed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). Statistical analysis involved t-tests, Chi-square, and correlation methods. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant. Ethical approval and informed consent were obtained from all participants. Results Among the 30 stable COPD and 30 AECOPD patients involved in this study, significant elevations in serum fibrinogen, D-dimer, and vWF levels were observed in the exacerbation group. Mean fibrinogen levels were markedly higher in the AECOPD patients (mean±SD: 577.23±112.12 mg/dL) compared to stable COPD (391.2±87.15 mg/dL; p<0.0001), and similar trends were seen for D-dimer (0.93±0.28 vs. 0.46±0.19 µg/mL) and vWF (159.2±36.42 vs. 116.6±30.23 IU/dL). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) using the area under curve (AUC) analysis identified fibrinogen as the most robust discriminator for AECOPD (AUC=0.89), D-dimer (AUC=0.82), and vWF (AUC=0.74). Other biomarkers like homocysteine, LDH, and PLR also exhibited significant elevations during exacerbations, correlating moderately with spirometric severity and symptom burden. Conclusions The findings suggest that AECOPD is associated with a pronounced prothrombotic milieu. Biomarkers such as fibrinogen, vWF, and D-dimer hold strong potential as indicators for early detection and risk stratification of acute exacerbations. Integrating these markers into routine COPD monitoring protocols may enhance clinical decision making, particularly in predicting exacerbation risk and guiding anti-inflammatory or anticoagulant therapies. Further longitudinal studies are warranted to validate their role in forecasting adverse events and long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.