Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40918887›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Menstrual Health in Female Bodybuilders During Competition Preparation.

Madison Lapp, Kendra Unger, Courtney Pilkerton, Erin White

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Madison LappOrthopedics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, USA.
Kendra UngerFamily Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, USA.
Courtney PilkertonFamily Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, USA.
Erin WhiteFamily Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBodybuilding is a sport of self-discipline and pushing the human body to the extreme limits, often accomplished with drastic training methods and supplement usage, which have the potential to be associated with severe health consequences. Various aspects of bodybuilding competition preparation, such as nutrition, exercise, and drug/supplement utilization, contribute to changes in female athletes' menstrual health.

methodsAn anonymous survey was conducted in women of reproductive age who were 18 and older assessing various techniques used during competition preparation and their menstrual cycles.

resultsSeven athletes completed the survey with the average weight loss during competition preparation being 6.4 kg. 42.9% of respondents reported using weight-cutting supplements and 28.6% reported using anabolic steroids. 85.7% of competitors had regular periods before competition and 57.1% experienced amenorrhea for at least one menstrual cycle during competition preparation. DISCUSSION: These competitors had low caloric intake for a prolonged period prior to competition, had high energy output, used exogenous supplements for cutting weight/augment training, and often experience amenorrhea for at least one menstrual cycle following competition.

conclusionWhile the sample size is limited, this study provides initial insight about an understudied population utilizing behaviors that have potential negative health outcomes when not conducted under the supervision of a healthcare professional.

Indexed as

bodybuildinglow energy availabilitymenstrual healthnutrition and exerciserelative energy deficiencywomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID40918887
PMCPMC12413752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.