ArticleCureus2025
Impact of Longitudinal Pulmonary Ultrasound Curriculum in a Multi-disciplinary Critical Care Fellowship.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has become a central component in the assessment and management of critically ill patients. Despite its widespread application, there is no standardized curriculum across critical care fellowships. Previous studies have examined the efficacy of ultrasound curricula in enhancing provider comfort and expertise with POCUS. However, these educational interventions are typically limited to specific critical care subspecialties and do not evaluate the longitudinal impact of POCUS training. In this study, we assessed the impact of a longitudinal pulmonary ultrasound curriculum on a multidisciplinary group of critical care fellows. Participants trained in internal medicine, emergency medicine, anesthesia, and neurology first completed a pre-training knowledge assessment. They then attended two one-hour didactic lectures on lung ultrasound (LUS). Hands-on training sessions were provided, with each fellow receiving two-hour scanning sessions under the guidance of critical care ultrasound faculty. Confidence among critical care fellows in acquiring and interpreting images increased from 57% (n = 21) to 79% (n = 19). Similar increases in fellow confidence were noted in using LUS to identify the etiology of respiratory distress and using ultrasound for the diagnostic and therapeutic management of pleural effusions. All study participants were able to accurately complete a comprehensive LUS exam within 10 minutes after training. Quality improvement initiatives and scan reviews provided ongoing feedback over the next year. Upon follow-up with graduates within a year of completing their fellowship, pulmonary ultrasound was routinely used in their practice, with an average frequency of two to three times per week. All respondents reported that pulmonary ultrasound training during fellowship had meaningfully changed how they integrate the tool into their clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.