Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40918770›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Deep Learning Model for Osteoporosis Screening From Chest Radiographs: A Multicenter Analysis of External Robustness and Model Calibration.

Yuichi Imoto, Takahiro Inui, Kentaro Matsui, Yoshinobu Watanabe, Takashi Igari, Shu Takeuchi, Mana Kimura, Satoshi Yagi, Hirotaka Kawano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. AI-derived opportunistic screening using chest radiographs identifies age- and sex-associated bone mineral density patterns and supports earlier osteoporosis evaluation.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yuichi ImotoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JPN.
Takahiro InuiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JPN.
Kentaro MatsuiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JPN.
Yoshinobu WatanabeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JPN.
Takashi IgariAI Integration Section, Technology Administration Supervision Department, Fuji Soft Incorporated, Tokyo, JPN.
Shu TakeuchiAI Integration Section, Technology Administration Supervision Department, Fuji Soft Incorporated, Tokyo, JPN.
Mana KimuraAI Integration Section, Technology Administration Supervision Department, Fuji Soft Incorporated, Tokyo, JPN.
Satoshi YagiAI Integration Section, Technology Administration Supervision Department, Fuji Soft Incorporated, Tokyo, JPN.
Hirotaka KawanoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a common condition, and treatment can reduce the risk of fracture and extend healthy life expectancy, but most cases go undiagnosed and untreated. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), the gold standard for diagnosing osteoporosis, is costly, time-consuming, and labor-intensive, with limited availability in low-resource settings and small clinics, so it is not suitable for screening for potential osteoporosis. To address this problem, in recent years, some studies have attempted to screen for osteoporosis by estimating DXA bone mineral density (BMD) from chest radiographs (CR), which are frequently used in daily clinical practice, by applying deep learning technology. Although these models have shown good screening performance, the performance of the external data from different facilities and equipments still requires further investigation. In this study, we developed deep learning models for osteoporosis screening and determined the performance of internal and external data. The performance on internal data was good across all models, accurately predicting osteoporosis diagnosed by DXA. Performance on external data exceeded that of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound (QUS), which is widely used as a screening tool for osteoporosis. The screening performance for external data was poor compared to internal data, but by mixing at least 500 external data into the training data, the model could be calibrated and the performance improved. Our results demonstrate that the model can easily perform osteoporosis screening from CR, the most commonly performed imaging test worldwide, without additional invasiveness or cost.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecalibrationchest radiographschest x-ray (cx-ray)deep learningexternal robustnessexternal validationosteoporosis screening

Identifiers

PMID40918770
PMCPMC12411072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.