ArticleCureus2025
Deep Learning Model for Osteoporosis Screening From Chest Radiographs: A Multicenter Analysis of External Robustness and Model Calibration.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-derived opportunistic screening using chest radiographs identifies age- and sex-associated bone mineral density patterns and supports earlier osteoporosis evaluation.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence standardizes CT-based body composition analysis in breast cacer to address methodological heterogeneity.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Deep learning in detection of osteoporosis: insights from recent evidence, and future directions.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in the Diagnosis and Management of Osteoporosis: A Comprehensive Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteoporosis is a common condition, and treatment can reduce the risk of fracture and extend healthy life expectancy, but most cases go undiagnosed and untreated. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), the gold standard for diagnosing osteoporosis, is costly, time-consuming, and labor-intensive, with limited availability in low-resource settings and small clinics, so it is not suitable for screening for potential osteoporosis. To address this problem, in recent years, some studies have attempted to screen for osteoporosis by estimating DXA bone mineral density (BMD) from chest radiographs (CR), which are frequently used in daily clinical practice, by applying deep learning technology. Although these models have shown good screening performance, the performance of the external data from different facilities and equipments still requires further investigation. In this study, we developed deep learning models for osteoporosis screening and determined the performance of internal and external data. The performance on internal data was good across all models, accurately predicting osteoporosis diagnosed by DXA. Performance on external data exceeded that of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound (QUS), which is widely used as a screening tool for osteoporosis. The screening performance for external data was poor compared to internal data, but by mixing at least 500 external data into the training data, the model could be calibrated and the performance improved. Our results demonstrate that the model can easily perform osteoporosis screening from CR, the most commonly performed imaging test worldwide, without additional invasiveness or cost.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.