Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40918763›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Difficulty in Tortuous Coronary Anatomy: A Case Report.

Ahmad Jalil, Fatima Rajab, Mehnaz Nadeem, Eisha Mazhar

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ahmad JalilInternal Medicine, Baptist Memorial Hospital-North Mississippi, Oxford, USA.
Fatima RajabInternal Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, PAK.
Mehnaz NadeemInternal Medicine, Baptist Memorial Hospital-North Mississippi, Oxford, USA.
Eisha MazharInternal Medicine, Shifa International Hospital Islamabad, Islamabad, PAK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the relatively common anatomical variants of coronary vessels that is often overlooked in clinical practice is coronary artery tortuosity (CAT). CAT can have a significant impact on coronary blood flow and procedural outcomes during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). It is defined by bends, curves, or loops within the coronary vasculature that can lead to increased vascular resistance. These structural changes can impair myocardial perfusion even in the absence of obstructive coronary disease. From an interventional perspective, tortuosity can present considerable technical difficulties, particularly in advancing guidewires, balloons, and stents through the affected segments. We describe the case of a patient whose PCI was complicated by extensive tortuosity involving the right coronary artery. She had high amounts of thrombosis that were impacting the blood flow, but the tortuosity of her vessel was making it hard to make the lumen patent again. Multiple attempts had to be made before adequate blood flow was achieved. This case highlights the often-underestimated impact of CAT on both coronary perfusion and interventional success. Recognizing this anatomical feature early and adapting the procedural strategy accordingly can significantly improve the chances of success and reduce the risk of complications in patients undergoing PCI.

Indexed as

coronary artery angiographycoronary artery tortuosityinterventional and structural cardiologyprimary percutaneous coronary intervention (pci)st-elevation myocardial infarction (stemi)stent delivery failure

Identifiers

PMID40918763
PMCPMC12408940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.