ArticleCureus2025
Awareness and Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence Language Generation Models in Medical Education: A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study Among Medical Students in Southern China.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Medical Students' Attitudes, Perceptions, and Self-Reported Familiarity With AI in Health Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR medical education · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the feasibility of artificial intelligence language generation models (AILMs) in medical education, we examined the utilization patterns and attitudes of medical students in a developed area of Southern China. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire survey assessing educational background, awareness, usage, and attitudes towards AILMs. Attitudes were measured using a five-point Likert scale, where scores of 4 or above indicated support, scores of 2 or below indicated opposition, and a score of 3 indicated a neutral stance. Results Among the 254 respondents, the average awareness score for AILMs was 2.4. AILMs were primarily used for solving medical and academic problems. Although students were aware of many domestic AILM products, foreign products were preferred. More than half of the students used AILMs less than once a week, and 13 (5.1%) students had never used them. A significant portion supported the integration of AILMs in current (187/254, 73.6%) and future (194/249, 78.0%) education, with a strong correlation between these attitudes (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.