ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
The effect of modulators on lung function following inpatient treatment for CF exacerbations.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Modulator therapy restores CFTR function and has led to health benefits for persons with cystic fibrosis (CF) (PwCF), including lower rates of pulmonary exacerbations. It is unknown if modulators affect lung function trajectories after inpatient treatment of pulmonary exacerbations (PEx). Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of hospital encounters for PEx for subjects 6-25 years old with mild to moderate lung disease admitted to a large tertiary care center from 2014 to 2021 to capture hospitalizations of PwCF before and after starting modulators. Descriptive analyses were used to characterize the population and lung function findings. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the association between modulators and FEV1pp outcomes. Results: The study sample included 575 encounters representing 149 unique PwCF. Hospital encounters of PwCF taking modulator were associated with higher mean FEV1pp at baseline, midway, discharge, and follow-up assessments. Mean FEV1pp increased during inpatient treatment of PEx with loss of lung function at follow-up, regardless of modulator use. Hospital encounters of PwCF not taking modulators were associated with less significant improvements in mean FEV1pp from admission at both midway and discharge (15.6% vs. 18.3%, 19.9% vs. 22.5%, no modulator vs. modulator groups, respectively). At follow-up, hospitalizations of PwCF taking modulators were associated with a significantly higher probability of sustained improvement in FEV1pp from discharge (difference in probabilities 0.119, Conclusions: Hospitalizations for PwCF taking modulators were associated with higher lung function at all assessments. Hospitalizations of PwCF taking modulators were associated with a significantly higher probability of sustained improvement in FEV1pp following discharge and a lower probability of loss of lung function from baseline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.