Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40918642›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on medical education2025

Time to Make Sense: Doctors' and Students' Experiences of Difficult Feedback.

Leonie Griffiths, Joanne Hilder, Elizabeth Molloy, Anna Ryan, Christopher Watling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Leonie GriffithsThe University of Melbourne, AU.ORCID 0000-0001-6908-7827
Joanne HilderSouthern Cross University, AU.ORCID 0000-0001-6809-6190
Elizabeth MolloyThe University of Melbourne, AU.ORCID 0000-0001-9457-9348
Anna RyanThe University of Melbourne, AU.ORCID 0000-0001-7458-027X
Christopher WatlingThe Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, CA.ORCID 0000-0001-9686-795X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Learners' experiences of feedback conversations, and their longitudinal impact, are largely invisible to educators. While we know more about what makes for an effective feedback conversation, we are yet to fully understand how learners make sense of these encounters over time. This has implications for understanding the potency of feedback on practice and for how best to support learners, particularly when the experience is challenging. Our research aimed to explore the characteristics of difficult feedback and the temporal aspects of feedback sensemaking. Methods: We collected written narratives from 32 doctors and 49 medical students via an online questionnaire about a time when they received difficult feedback in a clinical setting. Open- ended prompts facilitated participants to describe their experience, the evaluation of it over time, and the learning that arose from it. We undertook reflexive thematic analysis of the data, informed by constructivist sensemaking perspectives. Results: Difficult feedback conversations were characterized by unpredictable and complex interactions between emotions, sensemaking and learning. Despite some feedback perceived as personal, inappropriate, or threatening, feedback information was seldom disregarded. Participants engaged in feedback sharing and reflection, which often extended over years, contributing to identity work and to development of their clinical practice. Discussion: Our findings highlighted the temporal nature of sensemaking of difficult feedback and challenge expectations for learners to respond and commit to progress in the moment. Providing learners with time for reflection on feedback and opportunities to connect with personal and professional networks may facilitate the longitudinal sensemaking processes.

Indexed as

FeedbackFormative FeedbackPhysiciansStudents, MedicalAdultFemaleHumansLearningMaleQualitative ResearchSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40918642
PMCPMC12412442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.