Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40918623›Full record

ArticleHealth equity2025

Place Matters: Geographic Distribution of Abortion Fund Services.

Erin R Johnson, Monica R McLemore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health equity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Erin R JohnsonDepartment of Sociology, College of Liberal Arts, University of Southern Indiana, Evansville, Indiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2643-6534
Monica R McLemoreRory Meyers College of Nursing, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6539-4256

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Where you live impacts your access to all forms of health care, but abortion in particular. In response to restrictions on abortion, communities have organized to support those seeking abortion care via abortion funds. This study documents the services provided by these organizations and examines how they have been shaped by local conditions. Methods: Data come from a content analysis of the websites of all abortion funds affiliated with the National Network of Abortion Funds and interviews with 22 abortion fund leaders. Content analysis data presented include data about abortion funds' catchment area and what services funds provide. Results: Types of support offered by abortion funds include procedure funding, practical support, emotional support, other sexual health services, and parenting support. Interviews with fund leaders show that these services are shaped by local policies, cultural and geographic specifics of their catchment area, local clinics, and ties to other organizations in funds' communities. Discussion: Abortion funds are a diverse group of organizations that provide a variety of services to help patients overcome barriers to abortion. The geographic patterning of their services suggest that funds are responding to local environments, with the greatest variety of services being offered by funds in the South. Health Equity Implications: Abortion funds' service offerings clearly respond to the barriers to abortion described in the literature, driven by the needs of their local communities. This is particularly relevant in a post-Dobbs environment, as patients in some parts of the country find abortion even farther out of their reach.

Indexed as

abortioncommunity-based organizationshealth care accessreproductive health

Identifiers

PMID40918623
PMCPMC12412382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.