Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40918617›Full record

ReviewHealth equity2025

Empowering Women Through Knowledge: A Systematic Review of Literature on Menstrual and Reproductive Health Literacy.

Ashleigh Hansen, Jessica Bayes, Janet Schloss

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health equity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07766577 (Turkish Validity and Reliability of the Menstrual Cycle Knowledge Questionnaire in Female Athletes), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07766577 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Turkish Validity and Reliability of the Menstrual Cycle Knowledge Questionnaire in Female Athletes

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorBiruni UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled120ConditionsMenstrual Cycle, AthletesArmsMenstrual Cycle Knowledge Questionanire, Menstrual Symptom Scale, Health Literacy in Sports
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ashleigh HansenFaculty of Health, National Centre for Naturopathic Medicine, Southern Cross University, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7319-4014
Jessica BayesFaculty of Health, National Centre for Naturopathic Medicine, Southern Cross University, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia.
Janet SchlossFaculty of Health, National Centre for Naturopathic Medicine, Southern Cross University, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Reproductive health, including menstrual health, is a critical element of the overall well-being of women. Knowledge of menstrual health increases personal empowerment and self-care. This review explores adult women's knowledge of menstrual and reproductive health. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted across ProQuest, PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, and AMED, targeting original, peer-reviewed articles published between 2013 and 2023. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols 2020 guidelines, 649 articles were screened. Eighteen cross-sectional studies met the inclusion criteria after critical appraisal using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies. Results: Mean percentages of overall correct knowledge were provided in a limited number of studies, with scores ranging between 35.6% and 57.3%. In this review, mean values were calculated to represent categorical analysis of adult women's correct knowledge of ovulation, menstruation, and female physiology. The following values represent women's correct knowledge of these factors: timing of ovulation (43.7%), definition of ovulation (75.3%), identify physical signs of ovulation (52.4%), definition of menstruation (92.8%), identify menstrual cycle length (58.9%), identify duration of menstruation (44.6%), identify physical changes that might occur 2 weeks prior to menstruation (76.8%), identify female reproductive anatomy (68.9%), identify the term reproductive "hormones" (37%); identify the hormone estrogen (30.4%), identify the hormone progesterone (24%), correct knowledge of reproductive functional biology (51.2%), and correct knowledge of factors affecting reproductive health (62.8%). Conclusion: Adult women's knowledge of reproductive and menstrual health remains lower than expected due to various personal, cultural, and social factors. Developing educational and health promotion interventions is crucial to improving women's reproductive knowledge globally.

Indexed as

adult womenmenstrual healthmenstruationreproductive health literacy

Identifiers

PMID40918617
PMCPMC12411900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.