ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025
Acceptability of artificial intelligence in inclusive education: a TAM2-based study among preservice teachers.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of AI-mediated learning contexts in the personality-self-directed learning relationship among Chinese medical undergraduates: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence driven transformation of pediatric eye health education based on bibliometric analysis and a cross-sectional survey.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into education is generating growing interest, particularly due to its potential to support inclusive pedagogical practices. This is especially relevant for addressing the needs of students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The success of such integration largely depends on the acceptability of AI tools by educators, especially those still in initial training. This study aims to identify the factors influencing the acceptability of AI among pre-service teachers in the specific context of teaching students with ADHD. Methods: Grounded in the Technology Acceptance Model 2 (TAM 2), the study adopts a mixed-methods approach. Quantitative data were collected via structured questionnaires, and qualitative insights were obtained through semi-structured interviews with pre-service teachers in Morocco. Results: Findings reveal that perceived usefulness is the most influential predictor of AI acceptability, followed by perceived ease of use, voluntariness, and subjective norms. Participants emphasized the potential of AI to enhance pedagogical efficiency and support differentiated instruction. Institutional support and interface simplicity also emerged as key enablers. Discussion/Conclusion: These results highlight the need to incorporate digital literacy into teacher training programs and to develop AI tools specifically adapted to students with special educational needs. They also call for the establishment of a robust ethical and regulatory framework to ensure the responsible, equitable, and secure use of AI in education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.