ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Association of first-trimester exposure to Kampo medicines containing
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Traditional Japanese (Kampo) medicine containing Methods: From a large-scale Japanese health insurance claims database, we included pregnant women enrolled with the same healthcare insurer from 3 months before pregnancy to the date of delivery, who gave birth between 2010 and 2019, and whose data were linked to their infants. We then selected pregnant women who were prescribed KPK during the first trimester as the exposure group, and those who were prescribed tokishakuyakusan (TSS), commonly used for pregnancy-related symptoms, during the same period as controls. The association between KPK prescriptions and preterm birth or MCM among infants was examined using a multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: Of the 75,398 infants, TSS and KPK was prescribed to 2,548 (3.38%) and 283 (0.38%) women during the first trimester, respectively. In the TSS group, 311 of 2,491 infants (12.5%) experienced preterm births, whereas 40 of 283 infants (14.1%) in the KPK group experienced preterm births. The risk of preterm birth in the KPK group was not significantly different from that in the TSS group (adjusted risk ratio, 1.122; 95% confidence interval, 0.827-1.521). In the TSS group, 157 of 2,491 infants (6.3%) had MCMs, whereas 15 of 283 infants (5.3%) in the KPK group had MCMs. There was no significant difference in the incidence of MCM in the first year after birth between infants in the KPK and TSS groups (adjusted odds ratio, 0.820; 95% confidence interval, 0.475-1.415). Conclusion: There was no significant difference in the risk of preterm birth or MCMs between pregnant women prescribed KPK and those prescribed TSS during the first trimester.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.