Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40918448›Full record

ArticleDialogues in health2025

Water, sanitation, and hygiene challenges in last-mile artisanal mining communities in Ghana and Uganda.

David Owiredu, Hanna Chidwick, Betty Kwagala, Deborah Mensah, Lydia Osei, Lydia Kapiriri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dialogues in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David OwireduCentre for Evidence Synthesis and Policy, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Hanna ChidwickDepartment of Health, Aging & Society, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Betty KwagalaDepartment of Population Studies, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Deborah MensahDepartment of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Lydia OseiDepartment of Geography, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Lydia KapiririDepartment of Health, Aging & Society, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Access to water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) is critical for public health but remains inadequate in marginalized areas, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa's artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) communities. Adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in these settings face unique challenges that impact their health and wellbeing. Objective: This study aimed to assess WASH access among adolescent girls and young women (aged 10-24) in last-mile ASM communities in Ghana and Uganda, identifying disparities and factors influencing access. Methods: A cross-sectional, mixed-methods design was employed between March and May 2022 in selected ASM communities in Ghana and Uganda. The quantitative component included a sample of 1618 AGYW (808 in Ghana, 810 in Uganda) recruited through random household selection. Data were collected using interviewer-administered questionnaires adapted from validated sources, covering socio-demographics, water sources, sanitation, and hygiene practices. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and logistic regression were conducted, stratified by country, to examine associations between WASH access and sociodemographic factors. For the qualitative component, AGYW, community leaders, district officers, policymakers, and global experts were purposively selected. Data was collected through focus group discussions and in-depth/key informant interviews conducted in local languages. Thematic analysis was performed using NVivo 12, with illustrative participant quotes. Results: Quantitative findings showed that 86.2 % reported access to improved water sources, but only 10.1 % had access to improved toilet facilities. In Ghana, 83 % lacked any toilet facility; in Uganda, 65 % used unimproved latrines. Water access was associated with religion and education in Ghana, and toilet access was linked to residence and wealth in both countries. Qualitative findings revealed concerns about water quality, reliability, distance to water points, and major sanitation challenges, especially for women and girls. Cultural norms and mining-related environmental impacts further exacerbated WASH vulnerabilities. Conclusion: Significant disparities in WASH persist in ASM communities, particularly for sanitation. Context-specific, community-engaged interventions are urgently needed to address these gaps and promote health equity for AGYW in rural mining settings.

Indexed as

Adolescent girlsArtisanal miningGhanaSanitationUgandaWASHWater

Identifiers

PMID40918448
PMCPMC12409807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.