ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Finite element and preclinical analysis of tissue response to negative pressure wound therapy with a felted foam containing 10 mm through holes.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Development of a Syringe-Based Insulin Applicator Using a Biodesign-Based Methodology.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Not all wound patients are candidates for surgical debridement. A felted, reticulated open cell foam with an array of 10 mm holes (VFCC) for use with instillation therapy has been used to eliminate non-viable tissue from patient wound beds. The mechanisms for this have not been fully elucidated. The current study elaborates the biomechanical stresses, strains and work imparted to tissue with VFCC versus commonly used reticulated open cell foam (ROCF) dressings. Methods: Finite element analysis (FEA) measured strain and deformation occurring at the tissue interface with VFCC or ROCF. FEA results were compared to those in a preclinical, porcine sloughy wound model. Results: The peak maximum principal strain imparted to tissue at -125 mmHg with VFCC was 27.8% versus 0.9% with ROCF. The frictional work around the holes in the VFCC was 0.179 mJ while negligible with ROCF. Discussion: The FEA model predicted high strains at the sides of the macrodomes of tissue pulled into the through holes and was consistent with slough removal in the preclinical study. Frictional work around the 10mmholes in the VFCC may pin the tissue leading to higher strain energy densities as tissue is pulled into the holes allowing for fracturing and removal of devitalized tissue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.