Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40918443›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025

Finite element and preclinical analysis of tissue response to negative pressure wound therapy with a felted foam containing 10 mm through holes.

Amy K McNulty, Robert P Wilkes, Brenda Marchand, Shannon Ingram, Samantha Mann, James Sieracki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amy K McNultySolventum, St. Paul, MN, United States.
Robert P WilkesSolventum, St. Paul, MN, United States.
Brenda MarchandSolventum, St. Paul, MN, United States.
Shannon IngramSolventum, St. Paul, MN, United States.
Samantha MannSolventum, St. Paul, MN, United States.
James SierackiSolventum, St. Paul, MN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Not all wound patients are candidates for surgical debridement. A felted, reticulated open cell foam with an array of 10 mm holes (VFCC) for use with instillation therapy has been used to eliminate non-viable tissue from patient wound beds. The mechanisms for this have not been fully elucidated. The current study elaborates the biomechanical stresses, strains and work imparted to tissue with VFCC versus commonly used reticulated open cell foam (ROCF) dressings. Methods: Finite element analysis (FEA) measured strain and deformation occurring at the tissue interface with VFCC or ROCF. FEA results were compared to those in a preclinical, porcine sloughy wound model. Results: The peak maximum principal strain imparted to tissue at -125 mmHg with VFCC was 27.8% versus 0.9% with ROCF. The frictional work around the holes in the VFCC was 0.179 mJ while negligible with ROCF. Discussion: The FEA model predicted high strains at the sides of the macrodomes of tissue pulled into the through holes and was consistent with slough removal in the preclinical study. Frictional work around the 10mmholes in the VFCC may pin the tissue leading to higher strain energy densities as tissue is pulled into the holes allowing for fracturing and removal of devitalized tissue.

Indexed as

debridementfinite element analysisfrictionnegative pressure wound therapy with instillationnon-viable tissuestrainvacuum assisted closure (VAC)

Identifiers

PMID40918443
PMCPMC12409140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.