ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Engineering a 3D wounded skin equivalent to study early inflammatory and regenerative responses
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Engineering the Healing Process: Advanced In Vitro Wound Models and Technologies.Biomedicines · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Traditional models for studying wound healing, including 2D cell cultures and animal models, present substantial limitations in mimicking human skin physiology. In this study, we present a three-dimensional wounded skin equivalent (3DWoundSE) composed of human cells as a physiologically relevant Methods: The model builds upon a previously established 3D skin equivalent (3DSE) and incorporates a reproducible partial-thickness dermal punch wound. We characterised the 3DWoundSE using histology, cytotoxicity assays, immunofluorescence staining, and pro-inflammatory cytokine profiling at multiple time points post-wounding. Results: Results revealed hallmark wound responses, including increased lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF) expression, dynamic Ki-67 proliferation changes, and a pro-inflammatory cytokine response, notably elevated IL-6, IL-8, IL-33 and TNF-α levels. Discussion: Compared to the intact 3DSE, this 3DWoundSE demonstrated enhanced responsiveness to injury and cytotoxic stimuli, confirming its utility for early wound response assessment. This platform offers a reproducible and ethically sound alternative to animal models, with potential applications in dermatological research, drug development, and therapeutic screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.