ArticleNpj complexity2025
Assembly theory and its relationship with computational complexity.
Article in Npj complexity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapid Exploration of the Assembly Chemical Space of Molecular Graphs.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- Origins of life: the possible and the actual.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Article
- On the salient limitations of the methods of assembly theory and their classification of molecular biosignatures.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assembly theory (AT) quantifies selection using the assembly equation, identifying complex objects through the assembly index, the minimal steps required to build an object from basic parts, and copy number, the observed instances of the object. These measure a quantity called Assembly, capturing causation necessary to produce abundant objects, distinguishing selection-driven complexity from random generation. Unlike computational complexity theory, which often emphasizes minimal description length via compressibility, AT explicitly focuses on the causation captured by selection as the mechanism behind complexity. We illustrate formal distinctions through mathematical examples demonstrating that the assembly index is fundamentally distinct from complexity metrics like Shannon entropy, Huffman encoding, and Lempel-Ziv-Welch compression. We provide proofs showing that the assembly index belongs to a different computational complexity class compared to these measures and compression algorithms. Additionally, we highlight AT's unique ontological grounding as a physically measurable framework, setting it apart from abstract theoretical approaches to formalizing life that lack empirical measurement foundations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.