ArticleTherapeutic advances in reproductive health
The impact of multidisciplinary care on attrition rates in weight management programs for women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a scoping review.
Article in Therapeutic advances in reproductive health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is one of the most prevalent endocrine system disorders affecting reproductive-aged women of all races and ethnicities. A high prevalence of obesity exists in women with PCOS, who are also vulnerable to attrition from weight management programs. Despite recommendations the implementation of multidisciplinary approaches in weight management programs, there is a lack of literature evaluating their usage in their treatment programs. Objectives: The objectives of this scoping review are to critically examine existing empirical literature to describe multidisciplinary approaches to weight management in populations diagnosed with PCOS and to identify potential factors associated with attrition. Eligibility criteria: This review includes prospective studies of individuals aged 15 and older diagnosed with PCOS enrolled in a multidisciplinary weight management program. Multidisciplinary interventions were defined as participants receiving two or more multidisciplinary lifestyle interventions. Sources of evidence: A systematic search of five electronic databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Web of Science) identified articles with a multidisciplinary approach and reported data on attrition in PCOS weight management programs. Charting methods: A descriptive analytical approach and narrative synthesis was conducted to identify themes related to intervention delivery, attrition, and facilitators/barriers of PCOS lifestyle interventions. Results: From a total of 10,944 unique results, 11 articles met inclusion criteria for this review. Attrition rates ranged from 0% to 79.2%. Longer interventions were associated with higher rates of attrition. Control groups generally had lower attrition rates than their corresponding intervention groups. Studies incorporating technology-based interventions reported greater weight loss among participants. Conclusion: Attrition is inconsistently reported among PCOS weight management studies. Variation in attrition rates is likely influenced by several factors such as intervention length and intensity, identified facilitators and barriers to PCOS weight management, and the extent to which care plans are individualized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.