ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
The multidimensional attractiveness of marathon events: how self-efficacy bridges perception to participation.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Visual metaphors promote place bonding in urban marathon participation through emotional involvement and spatial meaning reconstruction: a ZMET-PLS-SEM study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- University marathons as structured health interventions: deconstructing the role of event culture, organization, activities and services in student engagement.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Although marathon events have gained global popularity and align closely with public health objectives, limited research has explored how individuals perceive the attractiveness of these events and how such perceptions influence participation intention. This study introduces the concept of "perceived attractiveness" as a multidimensional evaluation encompassing emotional, symbolic, cultural, and convenience facets related to participation. Drawing upon self-determination theory and self-efficacy theory, the study investigates how perceived attractiveness predicts participation intention, mediated by exercise-related self-efficacy. Methods: A sequential exploratory mixed-methods approach is adopted. Initially, grounded theory is applied to analyze 45 semi-structured interviews with marathon participants, yielding four dimensions of perceived attractiveness: psychological engagement, symbolic and social value, cultural and environmental atmosphere, and participation convenience. These dimensions inform the development of a structured questionnaire, which is subsequently administered to 426 respondents across China. Structural equation modeling (SEM) is employed to examine the hypothesized relationships among the variables. Results: All four dimensions of perceived attractiveness significantly predict marathon participation intention. Perceived symbolic and social value exerts the strongest effect, followed by participation convenience, cultural and environmental atmosphere, and psychological engagement. Self-efficacy is found to partially mediate all relationships, indicating that attractive perceptions enhance confidence, which in turn promotes participation intention. Discussion: The findings suggest that individuals are motivated to participate in marathons not only by intrinsic goals but also by their perceptions of the event's external characteristics. Perceived attractiveness acts as a cognitive-affective precursor to action, especially when mediated by self-efficacy. These insights contribute to sport psychology literature and offer practical implications for event organizers, educators, and policymakers seeking to foster sustained engagement in physical activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.