Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40918289›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Precision Emotion and Affective Context (PEAC) process model: a theoretical framework for creating the affective circumstances that promote engagement.

Stephanie M Carpenter, Nicole A Roberts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stephanie M CarpenterCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Nicole A RobertsSchool of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behavior change interventions are key to improving health and well-being. Knowledge of appropriate health behaviors does not, however, translate into engaging in them. We propose the "Precision Emotion and Affective Context (PEAC) Process Model of Engagement for Behavior Change" to serve as a theoretical framework to advance our understanding of how affect drives engagement and subsequent behavior change. Our framework highlights the importance of accounting for affective circumstances when designing and implementing behavior change interventions. The model accounts for affect that is both incidental and integral to the intervention: ongoing affective states that may work for or against the likelihood of engaging with the intervention (incidental), and affective states that are elicited by the intervention and consequently shape behavior change (integral). We focus on the promise of moderate levels of arousal and positive affective states, along with the need for contextual congruence, social acceptability, and personally meaningful approaches, for enhancing the likelihood of engagement and positive behavior change in interventions. Finally, just-in-time intervention approaches are discussed as a means of delivering personalized, affectively informed interventions that leverage advances in digital health technologies to promote opportunities for real-time implementation. This theoretical framework thus serves as a guide for constructing or harnessing the affective circumstances necessary to promote sustained intervention engagement and behavior change.

Indexed as

affectbehavior changeemotionengagementintervention

Identifiers

PMID40918289
PMCPMC12411214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.