ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Precision Emotion and Affective Context (PEAC) process model: a theoretical framework for creating the affective circumstances that promote engagement.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Behavior change interventions are key to improving health and well-being. Knowledge of appropriate health behaviors does not, however, translate into engaging in them. We propose the "Precision Emotion and Affective Context (PEAC) Process Model of Engagement for Behavior Change" to serve as a theoretical framework to advance our understanding of how affect drives engagement and subsequent behavior change. Our framework highlights the importance of accounting for affective circumstances when designing and implementing behavior change interventions. The model accounts for affect that is both incidental and integral to the intervention: ongoing affective states that may work for or against the likelihood of engaging with the intervention (incidental), and affective states that are elicited by the intervention and consequently shape behavior change (integral). We focus on the promise of moderate levels of arousal and positive affective states, along with the need for contextual congruence, social acceptability, and personally meaningful approaches, for enhancing the likelihood of engagement and positive behavior change in interventions. Finally, just-in-time intervention approaches are discussed as a means of delivering personalized, affectively informed interventions that leverage advances in digital health technologies to promote opportunities for real-time implementation. This theoretical framework thus serves as a guide for constructing or harnessing the affective circumstances necessary to promote sustained intervention engagement and behavior change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.