ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Neural representations of visual statistical learning based on temporal duration.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Time perception is an essential aspect of daily life, and transitional probabilities can be learned based on temporal durations that are independent of individual objects. Previous studies on temporal and spatial visual statistical learning (VSL) have shown that the hippocampus and lateral occipital cortex are engaged in learning visual regularities. However, it remains unclear whether VSL on temporal duration unlinked to object identity is represented in brain regions involved in VSL and object recognition or in those involved in time perception without sensory cortex involvement. We examined this question by adapting a VSL paradigm to time perception using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Thirty-four students participated in the VSL experiment, comprising a familiarization scan and a subsequent familiarity-decision test. The region-of-interest (ROI)-based classification showed chance-level performance across all ROIs, but only the left medial frontal gyrus, which is involved in subsecond time perception, showed a moderate effect size with 95% confidence intervals not crossing the chance level of 50%. Moreover, searchlight analysis showed that the right orbitofrontal cortex successfully decoded brain responses related to the processing of structured timing sequences. Meanwhile, representational similarity analysis suggested that the neural signal patterns could not be divided between the structured timing and pseudo-random sequences in the lateral occipital cortex. Our findings serve as a pilot study suggesting that the medial frontal and orbitofrontal regions are involved in VSL based on temporal duration, independent of visual object processing, which is a key and common timing mechanism for predicting sequential events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.