Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40918268›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025

Deep learning-based embedding of functional connectivity profiles for precision functional mapping.

Jiaxin Cindy Tu, Jung-Hoon Kim, Chenyan Lu, Patrick H Luckett, Babatunde Adeyemo, Joshua S Shimony, Jed T Elison, Adam T Eggebrecht, Muriah D Wheelock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jiaxin Cindy TuMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Jung-Hoon KimDeveloping Brain Institute, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Chenyan LuMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Patrick H LuckettDepartment of Neurosurgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Babatunde AdeyemoMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Joshua S ShimonyMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Jed T ElisonInstitute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Adam T EggebrechtMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Muriah D WheelockMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3409-8777

Funding

Research Education ComponentP30AG066444 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DAVID M. HOLTZMAN · 2020 to 2026
$28.7M
Leveraging pediatric state-specific functional brain network dynamics to predict developmental outcomesR01HD115540 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Muriah D Wheelock · 2024 to 2026
$1.9M
Innovative biostatistical approaches to network level analyses of connectome-behavior relationshipsR00EB029343 · NIBIB · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WHEELOCK, MURIAH D · 2022 to 2024
$955k
Network level analysis of progressive brain degeneration in autosomal dominant Alzheimer diseaseK99EB029343 · NIBIB · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WHEELOCK, MURIAH D · 2020 to 2021
$484k
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066444NIBIB NIH HHS K99 EB029343NIBIB NIH HHS R00 EB029343NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD115540
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatial similarity of functional connectivity profiles across matching anatomical locations in individuals is often calculated to delineate individual differences in functional networks. Likewise, spatial similarity is assessed across average functional connectivity profiles of groups to evaluate the maturity of functional networks during development. Despite its widespread use, spatial similarity is limited to comparing two samples at a time. In this study, we employed a variational autoencoder to embed functional connectivity profiles from various anatomical locations, individuals, and group averages for simultaneous comparison. We demonstrate that our variational autoencoder, with pre-trained weights, can project new functional connectivity profiles from the vertex space to a latent space with as few as two dimensions, yet still retain meaningful global and local structures in the data. Functional connectivity profiles from various functional networks occupy distinct compartments of the latent space. Moreover, the variability of functional connectivity profiles from the same anatomical location is readily captured in the latent space. We believe that this approach could be useful for visualization and exploratory analyses in precision functional mapping.

Indexed as

functional connectivityindividual differenceslatent spaceresting-state fMRI

Identifiers

PMID40918268
PMCPMC12409741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.