ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2025
Microbial diversity and composition in the gut microbiome of patients during systemic inflammatory response syndrome: can we use gut bacteria as potential biomarkers to characterize sepsis?
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Sepsis: Mechanisms of Action and Therapeutic Advances.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Exploring the oral microbiome diversity and genus signatures associated with a novel non-invasive metabolic indicator: a cross-sectional study.The Saudi dental journal · 2026Article
- Gut microbiome diversity, genus-level variation, and associations with clinical features in critically ill patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Gut microbiota and sepsis: mechanisms, clinical correlations, and therapeutic prospects.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Gut microbiome in sepsis: from dysbiotic biomarker to precision and palliative decision-making.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Critically ill patients, including those with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and sepsis, frequently exhibit gut microbiota disruption due to physiological stress and broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy (AT). Although antibiotics are essential for controlling infection, they can destabilize the gut microbiota and may contribute to poorer clinical outcomes. The characterization of the gut microbiota of these patients may inform microbiota-based interventions to mitigate antibiotic-induced dysbiosis. Objective: This study aimed to identify key bacterial taxa that distinguish sepsis from non-sepsis patients. Methods: A total of 89 stool samples (51 non-sepsis, 38 sepsis) were evaluated by amplicon sequencing the 16S rRNA gene to assess microbiota diversity and differential abundance. Samples were stratified by antibiotic exposure time: early AT (within 5th days of initiation) and prolonged AT (6th to 10th days). Additionally, patients were also grouped based on their AT: beta-lactam combined with other antimicrobial classes (BL-combined) and beta-lactam monotherapy (BL). Results: During early AT, alpha diversity (Shannon index) was significantly lower in sepsis patients compared to non-sepsis patients (2.48 Conclusions: Sepsis and non-sepsis patients showed distinct gut microbiota profiles in early AT. In sepsis, the loss of taxa involved in key metabolic functions, as short-chain fatty acid production, reflects dysbiosis and may contribute to worse outcomes. Prolonged antibiotic use may favor enteropathogen overgrowth and gut translocation. These findings highlight the potential of microbiota-based strategies to guide antimicrobial therapy and improve clinical outcomes in critically ill patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.