ArticleInterventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan)2025
Catch Up with the Latest Trend in Vascular Access Intervention.
Article in Interventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nurse-led shared decision-making for hemodialysis vascular access: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vascular access dysfunction remains a significant challenge in hemodialysis patients, primarily caused by stenosis and occlusion in arteriovenous fistulas and grafts. Recent advancements in percutaneous transluminal angioplasty have introduced innovative tools such as drug-coated balloons and stent grafts. Drug-coated balloons enhance patency by reducing neointimal hyperplasia through localized drug delivery, with superior outcomes demonstrated in randomized controlled trials. Stent grafts provide structural support and mitigates restenosis at venous anastomoses but faces challenges in maintaining long-term patency. Cutting balloons, a well-established device, offer a unique mechanism of controlled fibroelastic disruption, making them effective for resistant stenoses. This review evaluates the clinical impact of these devices, focusing on evidence from Japan, and emphasizes the importance of selecting the appropriate device based on individual lesion characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.