Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40918225›Full record

ArticlePain reports2025

Predicting acute postsurgical pain in the postanesthesia care unit: risk tool development and internal validation.

Nicholas Papadomanolakis-Pakis, Simon Haroutounian, Johan K Sørensen, Charlotte Runge, Lone D Brix, Christian F Christiansen, Lone Nikolajsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nicholas Papadomanolakis-PakisDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9624-6552
Simon HaroutounianDepartment of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Johan K SørensenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Charlotte RungeCenter for Elective Surgery, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg, Denmark.
Lone D BrixDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Christian F ChristiansenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Lone NikolajsenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Moderate-to-severe acute postsurgical pain (APSP) is experienced by approximately 30% of surgical patients. Objectives: To improve early APSP management, we developed 2 pragmatic and generalizable point-of-care risk tools to preoperatively predict moderate-to-severe and severe APSP in the postanaesthesia care unit (PACU). Methods: This was a multicenter prospective cohort study of adult patients undergoing elective surgical procedures between May 2021 and May 2023. Candidate predictors were preidentified. Logistic regression was used to develop the models. Internal validation was conducted with bootstrap resampling. Model performance was assessed by discrimination and calibration. Decision curve analysis was conducted to evaluate clinical utility of the models. Results: The final cohort included 1380 patients; 45.1% experienced moderate-to-severe APSP and 12.4% experienced severe APSP in the PACU. Predictors retained in the final models independently associated with increased risk of both moderate-to-severe and severe pain included younger age, female sex, preoperative pain in the surgical area, preoperative opioid use, and longer expected surgery duration. Orthopedic surgery and regional anesthesia were associated with decreased risk of both outcomes. In addition, minimally invasive surgery was associated with increased risk of moderate-to-severe APSP, and other preoperative pain was associated with increased risk of severe APSP. Optimism-corrected area under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.75 and 0.72 for moderate-to-severe and severe APSP models, respectively. Both models demonstrated good calibration and beneficial clinical utility. Conclusion: Our models developed using point-of-care data on a heterogeneous surgery sample demonstrated acceptable performance and clinical utility for early APSP prediction. External validation is needed before implementation.

Indexed as

Acute postoperative painPredictionPrediction model developmentPrognosisRisk stratificationRisk tool

Identifiers

PMID40918225
PMCPMC12410311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.