Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40918204›Full record

ReviewBiosafety and health2025

Biosafety concept: Origins, Evolution, and Prospects.

Wanying Gao, Zongzhen Wu, Kunlan Zuo, Qiangyu Xiang, Xiaoya Chen, Lu Zhang, Huan Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biosafety and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Understanding biosafety practitioner perspectives.Politics and the life sciences : the journal of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Bioengineering hybrid artificial life.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wanying GaoUniversity of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China.
Zongzhen WuUniversity of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China.
Kunlan ZuoUniversity of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China.
Qiangyu XiangUniversity of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China.
Xiaoya ChenUniversity of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China.
Lu ZhangUniversity of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China.
Huan LiuUniversity of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biosafety is essential to ensuring the safe and effective conduct of biological research by minimizing risks associated with laboratory work and biological materials. This paper traces the historical and conceptual development of biosafety, from its origins in pathogen containment to its expansion into broader domains. In the modern context, biosafety also involves the regulation of genetically modified organisms and the strengthening of laboratory oversight mechanisms. Biosafety and biosecurity are closely related in origin. Biosafety focuses on biological risks within laboratory environments, ​​while biosecurity addresses biological risks associated with non-laboratory environments. The article summarizes the development of biosafety, extracting the evolution of its conceptual framework from a historical perspective, condenses and compares its scientific characteristics with those of biosecurity, and applies the methodology of science history to define its conceptual framework​​.

Indexed as

BiosafetyCharacteristics evolutionComparative studyConcept formationHistory of science and technology

Identifiers

PMID40918204
PMCPMC12412398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.