Trial reportFrontiers in immunology2025
A phase II randomized trial of individualized neoantigen peptide vaccine combined with unusual radiotherapy (iNATURE) in advanced solid tumors-GCOG0028.
Trial report in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06314087 (Individualized Tumor Neoantigen Peptide Vaccine in Combination with Unusual Immune Stimulating Radiotherapy in Refractory Solid Tumors), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Individualized Tumor Neoantigen Peptide Vaccine in Combination with Unusual Immune Stimulating Radiotherapy in Refractory Solid Tumors (iNATURE) - a Phase II Randomized and Crossover Study
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A data-driven cartography of NSCLC vaccine research: Quantifying the paradigm shift toward immuno-oncology combination therapies.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Review
- Rethinking Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: Integrative Genomics, Immunotherapy, and Molecular-Orthomolecular Strategies.Cancers · 2026Review
- Radiation-induced remodeling of the T cell landscape in head and neck cancer.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2026Review
- Therapeutic Strategies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Advances and Future Perspectives.Vaccines · 2026Review
- Integrating biocomputational techniques for vaccine development for glioblastoma multiforme: a possible way of enhancing precision.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neoantigen-based vaccines show promising therapeutic potential in solid tumors such as melanoma, GBM, NSCLC, and CRC. However, clinical responses remain suboptimal in stage IV patients, due to ineffective T-cell function and high tumor burdens. To overcome these limitations, our study investigates a combination strategy using neoantigen peptide vaccines and precision critical lesion radiotherapy (CLERT), which delivers immunomodulatory doses to key tumor regions synergistically enhance immune activation and inhibit progression in multifocal stage IV patients. Materials/Methods: This is an open-label, multicenter phase II randomized study. The main objective is to evaluate the anti-tumor efficacy of personalized tumor neoantigen peptide vaccines and assess how different radiation doses synergize with vaccination in treating patients with advanced malignant tumors who have progressed after systemic therapy. Patients are stratified by cancer type and randomized 1:1 to receive either placebo with conventional treatment (including high and low dose radiotherapy) or a personalized neoantigen peptide vaccine alongside conventional treatment (including high and low dose radiotherapy). A one-way crossover design is implemented, permitting patients in the placebo arm to transition to the experimental arm upon progression. Clinical outcomes including progression-free survival and objective response rate are assessed both before and after crossover. Key inclusion criteria are as follows: 1) Patients with advanced or recurrent cancers detected by pathology and imaging, who failed first-line treatments; 2) Patients with projected survival ≥3 months and an ECOG score of 0-2; and 3) Patients with at least one predicted high-quality tumor neoantigen. Conclusion: This trial introduces an innovative combination strategy of precision radiotherapy and neoantigen vaccine. A notable feature of this study is the incorporation of a randomized control and intra-group crossover design, which is rarely utilized in neoantigen trials. The study is designed to provide critical insight into radiation-immune synergy and the clinical benefit of personalized immunization. Additionally, a basket-trial framework is employed, leveraging shared neoantigens across cancer types to improve efficiency and generalizability. This approach may reduce preparation time and cost, facilitating broader implementation of neoantigen-based immunotherapies. Altogether, this trial design represents a significant step toward translational application of tumor neoantigen vaccines and provides a platform for future combinational immunotherapy strategies. Trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06314087, identifier: NCT06314087; www.chictr.org.cn, identifier: ChiCTR2300078055. Global Collaborative Oncology Group (GCOG) identifier: GCOG0028.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.