Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40918086›Full record

ArticleObesity pillars2025

Healthcare professionals' perspectives on the current state of obesity management training: A mix methods study.

Francisca Contreras, Tak Ying Louise Ko, Carel W le Roux, Werd Al-Najim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity pillars, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Francisca ContrerasConway Institute, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Tak Ying Louise KoConway Institute, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Carel W le RouxConway Institute, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Werd Al-NajimConway Institute, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Obesity is a disease that represents a major global health problem, affecting over a quarter of European adults and straining healthcare systems. Despite its multifactorial causes, many healthcare professionals lack adequate training and confidence in delivering effective, person-centered obesity care. Weight stigma and misconceptions further impair outcomes. Thus, improved education and interprofessional training are essential to support healthcare professionals in delivering optimal obesity care. The aim of this study is to explore the current state of obesity management training among healthcare professionals working in obesity management services by identifying perceived training gaps, confidence levels and impact on clinical practice. Methodology: This study employed a mixed-methods design by combining a cross-sectional survey of 100 healthcare professionals with semi-structured interviews of 20 professionals who work in obesity management. Survey data were analyzed descriptively, and interview transcripts underwent thematic analysis using Braun and Clarke's framework. Results: Of the 100 healthcare professionals surveyed, 88 % reported actively working in obesity management and completed the full survey. Undergraduate training in obesity care was limited, with only 44 % receiving any, and only 12 % rated it as good or excellent. Postgraduate training was pursued by 51 %, with only 6 % completing formal advanced education. Participant perceptions of obesity training were organized in 5 domains: a) Current state of obesity management training, b) Confidence level, c) Gaps in training, d) Impact on clinical practice and d) Recommendation for obesity training curriculum. Conclusion: Healthcare professionals report significant gaps in obesity management training that impact their confidence and clinical practice. The key recommendations made by participants in this study reflect both the perceived deficits and a clear demand for more structured and comprehensive training in obesity management. Integrating structured, evidence-based obesity education into healthcare training programs is essential to reduce stigma, build competence, and improve obesity care.

Identifiers

PMID40918086
PMCPMC12408399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.