ArticleDigital health
Physiotherapists' delivery of a mobile health physical activity intervention for people post-stroke and transient ischemic attack: Insights from a feasibility study.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Mobile health (mHealth) offers a promising platform for promoting physical activity (PA) in individuals post-stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). However, the extent to which key intervention components of PA promotion can be adapted to a digital format remains unclear. This study examines the fidelity of delivering supervised physical exercise and support for individualized PA goals in a 6-month mHealth intervention. Methods: This feasibility randomized controlled trial included individuals post-stroke or TIA who participated in the mHealth version of the i-REBOUND program. Descriptive statistics were used to assess format (individual/group), and progression of supervised exercise, as well as the characteristics of PA goals (type and use of action planning) throughout the intervention. Results: Of the 57 participants enrolled in the i-REBOUND program (mean age: 71 years; 70% with stroke), 51 (89%) completed the intervention. Of the 1391 total exercise sessions delivered, the majority (62%) were performed at moderate or higher intensity (Borg rating ≥11). Additionally, 39 participants (71%) demonstrated exercise progression, and 49 participants (89%) participated in group sessions. A total of 293 PA goals were established, predominantly with a focus on performing a desired behavior. Defining frequency (88%), context (61%) and duration (53%) of PA goals was common, while defining intensity (25%) was less so. Discussion and conclusions: This study support the implementation of a mHealth-delivered supervised exercise program for people post-stroke or TIA, achieving target intensity, integrating group sessions, and progression. Refining goal-setting strategies to address diverse action planning components may enhance future mHealth interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.