ArticleDigital health
DVF-YOLO-Seg: A two-stage breast mass segmentation model with enhanced feature extraction and small lesion detection.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative performance of one-stage and two-stage deep learning models for instance segmentation of overhanging dental restorations on bitewing radiographs.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- SwinCAMF-Net: Explainable Cross-Attention Multimodal Swin Network for Mammogram Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Accurate segmentation of breast lesions, especially small ones, remains challenging in digital mammography due to complex anatomical structures and low-contrast boundaries. This study proposes DVF-YOLO-Seg, a two-stage segmentation framework designed to improve feature extraction and enhance small-lesion detection performance in mammographic images. Methods: The proposed method integrates an enhanced YOLOv10-based detection module with a segmentation stage based on the Visual Reference Prompt Segment Anything Model (VRP-SAM). A novel DualConv module is introduced to improve spatial, visual, and channel feature representation, while Varifocal Loss addresses class imbalance by emphasizing hard-to-detect lesions. The detection results are used to generate bounding box prompts for VRP-SAM, which refines the final lesion segmentation. Results: Experiments on the curated breast imaging subset of the digital database for screening mammography dataset demonstrate that DVF-YOLO-Seg achieves a precision of 79.7%, a recall of 81.5%, a dice coefficient of 80.2%, and an F1-score of 80.6%, outperforming baseline models. Particularly for lesions <5 mm, the model shows improved sensitivity. Ablation studies confirm the effectiveness of the DualConv module and Varifocal Loss. Additionally, the framework shows better visual consistency and clearer boundaries in clinician-evaluated results. Conclusion: DVF-YOLO-Seg significantly enhances the detection and segmentation accuracy for small breast lesions in mammography. By combining improved detection with prompt-based segmentation, this method offers a promising approach for computer-aided diagnosis in breast cancer screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.