ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2025
A pan-cancer, pan-treatment model for predicting drug responses from patient-derived xenografts.
Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The translatability of patient-derived xenograft (PDX)-generated clinical data into patient-specific outcomes for therapeutic guidance is limited by the challenges in generalizability of models across patients, treatments, and cancer types. Previously, machine learning (ML) models have been developed for the two most abundant cancer types, i.e. breast cancer and colorectal cancer, but these are unusable in other cancer types because each treatment/cancer type requires a different model to be trained. Here, we provide an ML framework to train a single pan-cancer, pan-treatment model for predicting treatment outcomes. We show that such models give promising results for all cancer types considered and reproduce the accuracy levels of individually trained cancer types. In the proposed model, all PDX genomic profiles from all cancer types are used as the training data, and instead of partitioning them into cancer types for each model, the cancer type and treatment name are appended as the input features of the training model. Using genomic-only and treatment-only embeddings and combining them with principal component analysis-based dimensionality reduction, our models show promising results and provide a framework for further improvements and real-time use for best treatment selections for cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.