Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40918051›Full record

ArticleNEJM AI2024

Co-creating Consent for Data Use - AI-Powered Ethics for Biomedical AI.

Barbara J Evans, Azra Bihorac

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NEJM AI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Safeguarding Neural Data.Neurology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Ethical Oversight and Social Licensing of Portable MRI Research.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Barbara J EvansLevin College of Law, University of Florida, Gainesville.ORCID 0000-0001-8115-7971
Azra BihoracIntelligent Critical Care Center, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville.ORCID 0000-0002-5745-2863

Funding

Bridge2AI: Patient-Focused Collaborative Hospital Repository Uniting Standards (CHoRUS) for Equitable AIOT2OD032701 · OD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BIHORAC, AZRA, CLERMONT, GILLES · 2022 to 2025
$24.6M
NIH HHS OT2 OD032701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As nations design regulatory frameworks for medical AI, research and pilot projects are urgently needed to harness AI as a tool to enhance today's regulatory and ethical oversight processes. Under pressure to regulate AI, policy makers may think it expedient to repurpose existing regulatory institutions to tackle the novel challenges AI presents. However, the profusion of new AI applications in biomedicine - combined with the scope, scale, complexity, and pace of innovation - threatens to overwhelm human regulators, diminishing public trust and inviting backlash. This article explores the challenge of protecting privacy while ensuring access to large, inclusive data resources to fuel safe, effective, and equitable medical AI. Informed consent for data use, as conceived in the 1970s, seems dead, and it cannot ensure strong privacy protection in today's large-scale data environments. Informed consent has an ongoing role but must evolve to nurture privacy, equity, and trust. It is crucial to develop and test alternative solutions, including those using AI itself, to help human regulators oversee safe, ethical use of biomedical AI and give people a voice in co-creating privacy standards that might make them comfortable contributing their data. Biomedical AI demands AI-powered oversight processes that let ethicists and regulators hear directly and at scale from the public they are trying to protect. Nations are not yet investing in AI tools to enhance human oversight of AI. Without such investments, there is a rush toward a future in which AI assists everyone except regulators and bioethicists, leaving them behind.

Identifiers

PMID40918051
PMCPMC12412891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.