ArticleTelemedicine reports2025
Patients and Provider Experiences with Telemedicine for Follow-up Care in Military Settings.
Article in Telemedicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Telemedicine offers patients and physicians the opportunity to advance health care delivery to active duty and retired military personnel. Assessing the efficacy and feasibility of performing post-surgery follow-up assessment through telemedicine at a large military hospital, while examining patient and provider experience and satisfaction with the telemedicine follow-up visit and estimating patients' willingness-to-use and willingness-to-pay for telemedicine consultations may help to shape the future use of telemedicine in the military settings. Methods: We administered surveys to 96 unique patients who agreed to perform a follow-up telemedicine visit, rather than a traditional face-to-face visit, after undergoing a minor surgery at a large army military hospital in the southeast region of the United States. We also administered a survey to six physicians. Results: Most of the patients strongly agreed (86.5%) or somewhat agreed (10.8%) that their medical problems were adequately addressed during the telemedicine visit. Most physicians were either satisfied (7.5%) or extremely satisfied (75.5%) with the overall experience. Less than half of the patients were willing to use a similar telemedicine visit for a fee in the future and only two patients were willing to pay $100 for such visit. Conclusion: After minor surgery, follow-up telemedicine visits may be an effective, efficient, and convenient alternative to face-to-face visits for active duty and retired military personnel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.